Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Good thing ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 16 of 22 Topic 8690 of 9134
Post > Topic >>

Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money

by Bob Lipton <boblipton@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 03:10 PM

BBO expert wrote:
> Lorne wrote:
> 
>> <henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
news:aa9cea00-e83d-45c4-ae08-d07cc75a8be0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>> (2) bid 4nt, invitational, and let Steven make the last mistake?
>>> (3) bid 4nt, asking for key cards in diamonds, and bash to slam,
>> I want to show a hand that is too good to pass but not good enough to
>> force to slam.
>>
>> It would seem that 4N should fill this role but you seem to have given
it
>> a
>> different meaning that forces me to guess.  Why do you need 4N as RKCB
>> when
>> you would have bid it last round if that is what you want to know?  As
far
>> as I can see you will never bid 4N in this sequence if it has the
meaning
>> you suggest as all hands wanting to bid it will do so a round earlier.
> 
> He gave _two_ meanings - clearly Henry can't play both of them, and I
> wouldn't be surprised if it was neither.
> 



No, it would be the other one.

Bob
 




 22 Posts in Topic:
Good thing we weren't playing for money
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 08:51:54 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
richlp <richlptx@[EMAI  2008-05-12 09:55:18 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-12 14:53:07 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[  2008-05-12 10:00:55 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
StevieTee <stevts@[EMA  2008-05-12 10:08:25 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-05-12 10:12:16 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Tim <thg@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 10:22:06 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 10:24:39 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Eddie Grove <eddiegrov  2008-05-12 12:43:54 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Nick France <gandalfnf  2008-05-12 10:26:50 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl  2008-05-12 13:57:43 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
"Thomas Dehn" &  2008-05-12 20:12:38 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
"Art Hoffman" &  2008-05-12 14:14:42 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
"Lorne" <lor  2008-05-12 19:24:51 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
BBO expert <nym@[EMAIL  2008-05-12 15:46:49 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-12 15:10:12 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-12 14:50:38 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-12 13:37:30 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-12 16:43:04 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Bill Jacobs <bill.jaco  2008-05-13 01:26:41 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-12 23:35:38 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[  2008-05-12 22:31:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 21:04:12 CDT 2008.