Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Good thing ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 22 Topic 8690 of 9358
Post > Topic >>

Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money

by Eric Leong <ewleongusa@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 10:12 AM

On May 12, 8:51=A0am, henrysun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> You hold, playing opposite Steven:
>
> AQxxx
> KQx
> Jx
> Kxx
>
> Because you believe that Edgar is right, and that opening 1nt with a 5-
> card major is one of the unforgiveable sins, you decide to open 1S.
>
> Steven surprises you by making a strong jump ****ft to 3d. =A0You rebid
> 3s to show your extra quality (5 to 2 of the top 3 honors) and Steven
> rebids 3nt.
>
> Do you
>
> (1) pass, playing for the sure plus and making the last mistake now?
> (2) bid 4nt, invitational, and let Steven make the last mistake?
> (3) bid 4nt, asking for key cards in diamonds, and bash to slam,
> making the last mistake yourself?
> (4) bash to slam and make the last mistake yourself?
>
> And how close do you think your decision is?
>
> (1) =A0Pretty clear: =A0Even Stig, Boris, and Eric would agree with my
bid=

> (2) =A0Kinda clear: =A0Maybe two out of the above named 3 would agree
with=

> my bid;
> (3) =A0It's a tossup: =A0If only one of the above named 3 would agree,
I'd=

> be happy
> (4) =A0Only an idiot would name names like this is a poll.
>
> Henrysun909

Playing 2/1, I would bid 6NT expecting partner to have at least 19+
hcp.
Playing 2/1, if partner had a 12-14 or 18-19 hcp balanced hand he
would bid 2D first and then bid 2NT.
With a 15-17 hcp notrump hand partner would bid 2D and then jump to
3NT.

Eric Leong
 




 22 Posts in Topic:
Good thing we weren't playing for money
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 08:51:54 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
richlp <richlptx@[EMAI  2008-05-12 09:55:18 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-12 14:53:07 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[  2008-05-12 10:00:55 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
StevieTee <stevts@[EMA  2008-05-12 10:08:25 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-05-12 10:12:16 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Tim <thg@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 10:22:06 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 10:24:39 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Eddie Grove <eddiegrov  2008-05-12 12:43:54 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Nick France <gandalfnf  2008-05-12 10:26:50 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl  2008-05-12 13:57:43 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
"Thomas Dehn" &  2008-05-12 20:12:38 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
"Art Hoffman" &  2008-05-12 14:14:42 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
"Lorne" <lor  2008-05-12 19:24:51 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
BBO expert <nym@[EMAIL  2008-05-12 15:46:49 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-12 15:10:12 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-12 14:50:38 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-12 13:37:30 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-12 16:43:04 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
Bill Jacobs <bill.jaco  2008-05-13 01:26:41 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-12 23:35:38 
Re: Good thing we weren't playing for money
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[  2008-05-12 22:31:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Aug 30 6:38:46 CDT 2008.