Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Responding ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 31 Topic 8683 of 9257
Post > Topic >>

Re: Responding to weak two

by "Art Hoffman" <arthhh@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 11, 2008 at 12:40 PM

"raija d" <mustikka@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:y5EVj.15$v04.12@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> All white, online IMPs indy, first hand with unknown partner from Poland

> on BBO  Self-rating was Expert, but as we all know it does not mean 
> anything. [Well, if he were from a certain other country, I would know
it 
> means he is intermediate at best...]
>
> (P) 2S (P) ?
>
> Your have VOID-J10xxxxx-xx-10xxx.  Assume you would Pass as I did.
>
> (P) 2S (P) P
> (X)  P  (P) ?
>
> Pass again or what?

Or what.  First thing I might have done after he opened 2S is look at his 
profile.  Many, if not most, of the Polish players I've played with use
some 
5/5 M/m convention at the 2 level.  If that is not applicable (and I'm not

sure what I'd do if it did apply, well maybe 2NT), I'd still bail to 3H. 
My hand is worthless to partner and I might get lucky and find partner
with 
some helpful cards.  Moreover, this is a BBO indy and I think I'd have
some 
company at this contract doubled or 3NT by RHO.  And I'm only playing one 
hand with him.  So, if it doesn't work out, c'est la vie.  I haven't lost
a 
friend for life.
 




 31 Posts in Topic:
Responding to weak two
"raija d" <m  2008-05-11 08:18:28 
Re: Responding to weak two
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 08:31:43 
Re: Responding to weak two
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-12 22:41:21 
Re: Responding to weak two
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-11 08:46:14 
Re: Responding to weak two
"Art Hoffman" &  2008-05-11 12:40:25 
Re: Responding to weak two
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 20:02:09 
Re: Responding to weak two
grbridgeREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL  2008-05-11 21:04:45 
Re: Responding to weak two
Nick France <gandalfnf  2008-05-11 14:07:59 
Re: Responding to weak two
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-05-11 17:41:10 
Re: Responding to weak two
"John R. Mayne"  2008-05-11 17:35:58 
Re: Responding to weak two
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-05-11 17:42:26 
Re: Responding to weak two
ted <morristed@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 18:31:49 
Re: Responding to weak two
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 18:48:31 
Re: Responding to weak two
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-11 20:03:56 
Re: Responding to weak two
"John R. Mayne"  2008-05-11 20:56:16 
Re: Responding to weak two
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-05-12 02:48:08 
Re: Responding to weak two
"raija d" <m  2008-05-11 21:41:55 
Re: Responding to weak two
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-05-11 23:19:06 
Re: Responding to weak two
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-05-12 22:50:15 
Re: Responding to weak two
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-05-11 22:14:12 
Re: Responding to weak two
"Lorne" <lor  2008-05-12 20:00:19 
Re: Responding to weak two
susanandgerry@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 17:28:16 
Re: Responding to weak two
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S  2008-05-12 17:40:57 
Re: Responding to weak two
susanandgerry@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 17:47:06 
Re: Responding to weak two
Bill Jacobs <bill.jaco  2008-05-13 04:06:29 
Re: Responding to weak two
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-12 21:13:20 
Re: Responding to weak two
gazelle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-24 15:14:09 
Re: Responding to weak two
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-05-12 21:30:46 
Re: Responding to weak two
"raija d" <m  2008-05-12 23:30:25 
Re: Responding to weak two
ted <morristed@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 16:25:34 
Re: Responding to weak two
Free <fstaelens@[EMAIL  2008-05-13 02:57:46 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Aug 21 14:54:39 CDT 2008.