Re: bad judgment or bad luck?

<henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 9, 9:25 pm, CBFalconer <cbfalco...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > henrysun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > > CBFalconer <cbfalco...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > Your answers are virtually unintelligible, because of the faulty
> > > quoting mechanism.  If you must use google, please read the
> > > following, and the referenced URL.
> >
> > > *************
> >
> > > Well, this is the first I've ever heard about my answers on
> > > rec.games.bridge being "virtually unintelligible."
> >
> > ... snip ...
> >
> > > Apparently, that causes its own problems.  Well, so do 4 card majors
> > > and weak 1nts (shrug).
> >
> > The lack of normal quote marks is the worst.  And I did think I
> > made a peaceful suggestion, with no attempts at warring.  Note how
> > it is hard to tell your contribution from mine in the above quote.
> 
> You mean that the dotted line of asterisks (******************) isn't
> sufficient to separate the snippet I'm discussing and my contribution
> to it?

It is impossible to see whether the part above those
asterisks is yours, or the part below those asterisks.


Thomas