Re: bad judgment or bad luck?

On May 9, 9:25 pm, CBFalconer <cbfalco...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> henrysun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > CBFalconer <cbfalco...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Your answers are virtually unintelligible, because of the faulty
> > quoting mechanism.  If you must use google, please read the
> > following, and the referenced URL.
>
> > *************
>
> > Well, this is the first I've ever heard about my answers on
> > rec.games.bridge being "virtually unintelligible."
>
> ... snip ...
>
> > Apparently, that causes its own problems.  Well, so do 4 card majors
> > and weak 1nts (shrug).
>
> The lack of normal quote marks is the worst.  And I did think I
> made a peaceful suggestion, with no attempts at warring.  Note how
> it is hard to tell your contribution from mine in the above quote.
>
> --
>  [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
>  [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
>             Try the download section.
>
> ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**

You mean that the dotted line of asterisks (******************) isn't
sufficient to separate the snippet I'm discussing and my contribution
to it?

Now I'm really speechless...

Henrysun909