Re: "Chris Pisarra" violated his agreement with Sam's Club

On May 6, 2:36=A0pm, "Frank Arthur" <A...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Chris Pisarra" =A0you signed an agreement to abide by the rules of
> Sam's Club. Then you violated those rules by protesting the legitimate
> Sam's Club rule.

++++I don't think that a protest itself would violate the rules.
Refusing to comply probably would. Not that it matters much in this
case (I expect to see this re****ted in the London Times any day now)


>The only reason Sam's gave you a refund because you
> were obviously out of control and behaving like a maniac about to go
> berserk.


++++Well, it read to me that he got into an argument, it didn't sound
as though he was frothing at the mouth. Kingsley Amis maintained, by
the way, that berserk should be pronounced BER-zerk, but nobody said
it like that because it made you sound, well, berserk if you did.

 You should seek psychiatric care. I wouldn't want to see you
> walking the streets while my family was around.

++++I wouldn't want to see him walking the streets, either, and I hope
that Chris' refusal to avail himself of the bargains at Sam's Store
doesn't mean penury, with the result that we both fear.