Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: easy enough...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 3 Topic 8657 of 9128
Post > Topic >>

Re: easy enough as a book problem?

by Charles Brenner <cbrenner@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 6, 2008 at 04:45 PM

On May 3, 11:07 pm, Nick Hughes - notebook <nhug...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> N/EW
>                 6
>         -       65432
>         -       A5
>                 AQ764
>         8432
>         QT9
>         K86
>         T52
>
> WEST    NORTH   EAST     SOUTH
>          2NT              3NT
>
> 2NT was 20-21. You lead a club-2-8-9.
> Declarer leads a diamond towards the king.
> You duck uneasily.
> Declarer plays S-AK, partner playing a helpful SJ first time.
> Your pitch on the second spade?
>
> Nick

The ace of diamonds is tempting, but it's not certain.

What if declarer has AKQ, KJ, QJ10xx, KJ9, and thinks of playing this
way to induce the diamond ace discard. That would be a coup! Or if
declarer has AKQ, Axx, QJ10x, KJ9, pretty much the same.

Trick 1 may be a clue. Why is declarer so anxious to tell us the club
position? The normal play would be to win trick 1 with the J (not that
it would fool anyone -- partner would play the 3 not the 8 from 983).

Charles
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
easy enough as a book problem?
Nick Hughes - notebook &l  2008-05-04 06:07:26 
Re: easy enough as a book problem?
rhm <rhm@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-04 06:57:01 
Re: easy enough as a book problem?
Charles Brenner <cbren  2008-05-06 16:45:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 7:53:24 CDT 2008.