Bill Jacobs wrote:
> gazelle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Kenny McCormack) wrote in
> news:fvn280$k03$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> In article
>> <6fca16e4-defb-404c-98c4-50fa9f809daa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> Eric Leong <ewleongusa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> On May 4, 12:51 pm, gaze...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Kenny McCormack)
>>> wrote:
>>>> Standard-ish methods, IMPs. You hold: AKxxx,Axxx,x,KQx
>>>> You open 1S, pd bid 2H (opps silent).
>>>>
>>>> Your bid?
>>>>
>>>> Think about how little it takes for slam. How to proceed?
>>> There is no question about reaching at least 6H unless in the very
>>> unlikely case you are missing a key card and the trump queen.
>> I think a lot of you are assuming 2/1. This is not standard.
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> x
>> Jxxxx
>> KQJx
>> Axx
>>
>> Even 4 could go down. Especially on BBO (always keep that in mind).
>>
>
> What are you angling for?
>
> When someone suggests a good scientific bid, eg 3H or 4D, you tell us
that
> partner is not up to understanding that,
>
> When someone suggests a good unscientific bid, eg 4NT, you list an
unlikely
> hand that makes that a poor choice. (Although even with your example
hand,
> 5H could easily survive.)
>
> It seems that nothing will satisfy you.
Greed and fear, greed and fear, that's what's driving him here, just
like the people in the stock market, greed for the slam and fear that 4
will go down. And, as I remarked to Henry Sun on another thread, it's
all chimeras. Guess wrong and what will happen? They will come and take
your aged mother away? Your girlfriend will leave you for having such a
small *****? Agents of FEMA will seize you foruse in stem-cell research?
The sun will go supernova?
No. You'll be too low or too high in a bridge contract. It 's not
even for money, apparently. So run a few hands that partner might have
through your head, take another bid that matches a couple of tem and
see what happens.
Bob
|
