Re: Quick question for any directors out there please.

David Stevenson wrote:
>   Thankyou: you are not the first to criticise the layout.  Perhaps you 
> will be the first to suggest a better one. 

I'll give it a try.  The problem, I think, is that the subsections in 11 
are all marked "allowed at level xx," but the minimum strength 
requirements are really prohibitions.  What about moving 11C1 and 11C9 
to within 11B, and retitling 11B "prohibitions" (which is what 11B is 
now)?  You would have to rephrase 11C1 and 11C9 a bit, but I don't think 
you would have to change anything else, though I haven't looked in detail.