Re: What's wrong with the Roth point count?

Andrew wrote:

> Since you failed to respond to my rebuttal of your criticisms, I can
> only conclude that you agree that you stand corrected. Regarding your
> churlish and childish manners, either a Dale Carnegie course or
> preferably a psychiatric institution might be a good solution.

Since you know nothing of the method you "criticize", there is no need 
to respond to your vacuity.  Had I the anti-gmail filters in this 
newsgroup that I have in others, I would have never seen your ignorance 
masquerading as knowledge.  Nor would I have seen your whining that I 
have not responded to your ignorant vacuity. Or your ad hominem attack, 
of which you seem to be the master while falsely accusing others of it. 
  That can be fixed for you: *PLONK*