Re: S:JT H:KT63 D:A72 C:9764, ok, what happens next...?

On May 1, 5:56 pm, Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 5/1/2008 5:37 PM, Histriadogsilver wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 2, 1:40 am, vspo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >> On Apr 30, 2:18 pm, Histriadogsilver <andjelka.rich...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> On Apr 30, 7:50 pm, vspo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >>>> On Apr 28, 10:33 am, Histriadogsilver
<andjelka.rich...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> West   North   East   South
> >>>>>  ------      1H       p        2H ( constructive raise otherwise
1N F1
> >>>>> with subsequent 2H rebid)
> >>>>>    p        2S!!      p         ?
> >>>>> The bid of 2S!! is showing a shortness somewhere. What do you do
now?
> >>>>> A.) You ask with 2N since you are interested in knowing in which
suit
> >>>>> the shortness is
> >>>>> B.) You deny the invitation with 3H since your hand has minimum
values
> >>>>> for the shown raise
> >>>>> C.) You just blast to game
> >>>>> I'll show you partner's hand later.
> >>>>> Boris
> >>>> Opener got lucky.  No way Axxx QJ9xx KQx x is worth an invite over
> >>>> a constructive 2H raise.  The raise doesn't promise 4 hearts, does
it?
> >>>> Responder could have a max and 2H is still the limit for the two
> >>>> hands.
> >>>> Qx KTx xxxx Axxx.  Some may even go down in 2H.
> >>> And believe it or not you just bid 3C or 3D when you are holding
three
> >>> trumps and a maximum (otherwise 3H), holding four card sup****t is a
> >>> huge improvement, that is why this hand xx KTxx Axx xxxx is a
minimum
> >>> that can hugely improve if you find a fitting shortness in partner's
> >>> hand and this hand Jx KTx Axxx xxxx is just not strong enough for a
2H
> >>> raise. Basically you bid 2H with an exceptional 7 count and four
card
> >>> sup****t or with a good 8 to a bad 11 count. Talking about having
some
> >>> bidding judgment here.
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Boris
> >> Most partner****ps' constructive raises do not promise four card
> >> sup****t.
> >> What do you bid with 8-10 and only 3 card sup****t?  I'm certainly not
> >> bidding more than 2H.
>
> > What's the point in discussing bidding styles other than disagreeing
> > with each other.
>
> > Boris
>
> Well, the point is you asked us how we would bid this hand, and we
> thought xx KTxx Axx xxxx was a very good hand for 2H, willing to accept
> any further invitation. If your style calls this a minimum 2H, you will
> get fairly useless answers unless you tell us what the range for 2H is.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>      Alan (San Jose, California, USA)

Rofl, well this just goes to show that...

On second thought, perhaps I'd best keep my comments to myself
hehehehehehehe.....

My big ol' mouth has gotten me into way too much trouble recently.

Henrysun909