

|
 |
| Gaming > Bridge > Re: S:JT H:KT63... |
|
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 40 of 43 Topic 8627 of 9096
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: S:JT H:KT63 D:A72 C:9764, ok, what happens next...?
by vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
May 1, 2008 at 04:40 PM
| On Apr 30, 2:18 pm, Histriadogsilver <andjelka.rich...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On Apr 30, 7:50 pm, vspo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 28, 10:33 am, Histriadogsilver <andjelka.rich...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
>
> > > West North East South
> > > ------ 1H p 2H ( constructive raise otherwise 1N
F1
> > > with subsequent 2H rebid)
> > > p 2S!! p ?
>
> > > The bid of 2S!! is showing a shortness somewhere. What do you do
now?
>
> > > A.) You ask with 2N since you are interested in knowing in which
suit
> > > the shortness is
> > > B.) You deny the invitation with 3H since your hand has minimum
values
> > > for the shown raise
> > > C.) You just blast to game
>
> > > I'll show you partner's hand later.
>
> > > Boris
>
> > Opener got lucky. No way Axxx QJ9xx KQx x is worth an invite over
> > a constructive 2H raise. The raise doesn't promise 4 hearts, does it?
> > Responder could have a max and 2H is still the limit for the two
> > hands.
> > Qx KTx xxxx Axxx. Some may even go down in 2H.
>
> And believe it or not you just bid 3C or 3D when you are holding three
> trumps and a maximum (otherwise 3H), holding four card sup****t is a
> huge improvement, that is why this hand xx KTxx Axx xxxx is a minimum
> that can hugely improve if you find a fitting shortness in partner's
> hand and this hand Jx KTx Axxx xxxx is just not strong enough for a 2H
> raise. Basically you bid 2H with an exceptional 7 count and four card
> sup****t or with a good 8 to a bad 11 count. Talking about having some
> bidding judgment here.
>
> Cheers
> Boris
Most partner****ps' constructive raises do not promise four card
sup****t.
What do you bid with 8-10 and only 3 card sup****t? I'm certainly not
bidding more than 2H.


|
43 Posts in Topic:
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-28 10:33:53 |
|
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-04-28 12:29:54 |
|
Will in New Haven <bil |
2008-04-28 12:47:56 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-28 12:50:09 |
|
hoffman@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-04-28 12:58:28 |
|
Charles Brenner <cbren |
2008-04-28 12:59:35 |
|
"raija d" <m |
2008-04-28 18:01:54 |
|
Eric Leong <ewleongusa |
2008-04-28 13:30:46 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-28 13:54:21 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-28 16:24:10 |
|
"Lorne" <lor |
2008-04-29 01:53:31 |
|
"Kieran Dyke" & |
2008-04-29 15:01:19 |
|
Charles Brenner <cbren |
2008-04-28 22:22:47 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 03:06:48 |
|
Eric Leong <ewleongusa |
2008-04-29 03:11:09 |
|
"Kieran Dyke" & |
2008-04-29 21:41:03 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 03:43:47 |
|
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-04-29 04:19:55 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 04:25:30 |
|
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-04-29 05:04:10 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 05:22:48 |
|
"Thomas Dehn" & |
2008-04-29 20:01:43 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-29 12:57:35 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 13:43:49 |
|
"Thomas Dehn" & |
2008-04-30 19:28:08 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-29 13:45:36 |
|
Bob Lipton <boblipton@ |
2008-04-29 17:14:44 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 14:50:56 |
|
Charles Brenner <cbren |
2008-04-29 15:42:41 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-29 17:11:05 |
|
ted <morristed@[EMAIL |
2008-04-29 20:22:13 |
|
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-04-29 20:42:59 |
|
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-04-30 10:50:17 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-30 11:53:03 |
|
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[ |
2008-04-30 13:39:34 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-30 14:18:35 |
|
Bob Lipton <boblipton@ |
2008-04-30 17:30:10 |
|
"raija d" <m |
2008-04-30 14:45:45 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-30 14:35:00 |
|
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-05-01 16:40:56 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-05-01 17:37:56 |
|
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S |
2008-05-01 17:56:41 |
|
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-05-01 18:12:43 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|