Re: Quick question for any directors out there please.

On Apr 28, 8:28=A0pm, Adam Beneschan <a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 28, 7:39 am, darren.cotter...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> > Ok - just checked out a couple of resources and both say Kx is 1 loser
> > - can't see that myself - I've always counted it as 2 - how can Kx be
> > 1 loser and Ax one loser?
>
> That's why I don't use Losing Trick Count.
>
> > Maybe Kx 1.5 losers and QTxx 2.5.
>
> No, no, no, you're not supposed to think. =A0You're just supposed to
> count on your fingers like a six-year-old.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -- Adam

++++The range of interpretations of how many losers this hand has
demonstrate that whilst LTC may be useful as a subjective *****sment
of the hand it's totally useless when it comes to using it to explain
what a bid means.