Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Smolen & Pu...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 16 Topic 8641 of 9135
Post > Topic >>

Re: Smolen & Puppet

by Alan Malloy <alan.NO.SPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 30, 2008 at 03:40 PM

On 4/30/2008 3:17 PM, Jim Greer wrote:
> I have been playing Smolen for years and have never played Puppet
although 
> I'm familiar with the rudiments.
> 
> Am considering adding Puppet but would like to know if there are
conflicts.
> 
> Thanks in advance for replies.
> 

It depends on exactly what you mean by Smolen and Puppet. Many pairs 
play Puppet only over 2NT, and Smolen only over 1NT, and they obviously 
have no conflicts. If you are planning to play them both over 1NT there 
shouldn't be any any conflicts, except that the Smolen bid will now look 
more like 1n-2c;2n-3h.

Personally I don't think Puppet over 1NT is a good idea, because it 
removes a lot of the other nice features of Stayman (you can invite 
game, bid a minor naturally, use Garbage Stayman to get out at the two 
level, etc.), in exchange for being even better at finding major-suit 
fits. In the partner****ps where I play Puppet over 1NT, I usually prefer 
to have 1n-2c as regular Stayman, and 1n-3c as GF Puppet. This gives up 
the option of inviting with a broken minor, but I find those hands are 
rare enough that I don't mind so much. I believe I am in the minority 
here, as I've run into few people who play 1n-3c as Puppet, but if you 
want to be able to open 1NT with a five-card major, without making big 
changes to your system, this isn't a terrible way to do it.

If you want to play them both over 2NT, you are out of luck. There isn't 
room, and you'll have to decide which one you like better (either one is 
playable).

-- 
Cheers,
     Alan (San Jose, California, USA)
 




 16 Posts in Topic:
Smolen & Puppet
"Jim Greer" <  2008-04-30 18:17:43 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S  2008-04-30 15:40:54 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
BBO expert <nym@[EMAIL  2008-05-01 11:36:03 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
"raija d" <m  2008-04-30 16:27:25 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-30 16:53:19 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S  2008-04-30 17:35:30 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
Sid <elsid@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-01 15:03:25 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
"raija d" <m  2008-05-01 07:11:46 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
BBO expert <nym@[EMAIL  2008-05-01 11:44:27 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
David Babcock <dpb3@[E  2008-04-30 18:17:11 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
David Babcock <dpb3@[E  2008-05-01 03:47:54 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
smn <smnewberger@[EMAI  2008-04-30 22:12:14 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
paulhigh@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-01 07:46:09 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
BBO expert <nym@[EMAIL  2008-05-01 12:20:21 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S  2008-05-01 10:41:37 
Re: Smolen & Puppet
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-01 11:00:00 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 2:47:59 CDT 2008.