Re: Quick question for any directors out there please.

On 30 Apr, 17:06, BBO expert <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Except that in this case, the director's ruling appears to be that the
_bid_
> was illegal, not any followups - and since the following bid was
natural, I
> would think it should have been permitted whether or not the regulation
was
> Ro18 or Ro19.  So while _you_ don't ban such bids, some EBU directors
seem to.

They don't have to use the follow ups for the agreement to be illegal.

If the regulation was Ro19
and if the partner****p agreement was to open 1S on this Ro18 hand
and if the partner****p agreement was to (say) play 1S-4NT as Blackwood
then the 1S bid was illegal.

Robin