Re: Quick question for any directors out there please.

Steve Foster wrote
>>   Incidentally, why would 11C11 be redundant?
>
>Because I combined it into a revised 11C2 (see I was already thinking
>about your "consistent style" without even realising it).

   So now you are making it even less consistent.  I really dislike that. 
People who know how it is laid out - hardly rocket science - may now 
miss it.

>A 3rd solution would be to split the chapter into subchapters and
>explicitly cover each level separately in full (doing away with "all
>levels" and "3/4"), and duplicating the common information. Yes, I know
>duplication isn't a good thing, but it would be worth it for the
>clarity. It'd make it easier to avoid situations like the one that
>started this thread.

   This was suggested and turned down very quickly.  Much longer, and 
often very unhelpful, when people want ot know when they may play 
something: you are back ot the bad old days of having  to look in many 
different places.

-- 
David Stevenson           Bridge      RTFLB       Cats       Railways
Liverpool, England, UK    Fax: +44 870 055 7697        ICQ:  20039682
<webjak666@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                             bluejak on OKB
                           Bridgepage: http://blakjak.org/brg_menu.htm