Histriadogsilver wrote:
> On Apr 29, 3:33 pm, "Steve Foster" <stevefos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> > Histriadogsilver wrote:
> > > On Apr 28, 5:02 pm, David Stevenson <brid...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Histriadogsilver wrote
> >
> > > > > I may not be right even though I strongly believe I am.
> > > > > Staying low is generally better, what if responder is 5=2=4=4?
> >
> > > > Silly me, I had not even considered that ....
> >
> > > Do you have a problem?
> >
> > If you have 15 cards in your hand (5=2=4=4 shape), someone should
> > have a problem.
> >
>
> If I removed the post and you are still insisting on something that
> you saw for ten seconds or so than I have no words for describing such
Your post (and the subsequent ones) simply showed up as normal in my
newsreader last time I asked it to download new messages. There's no
hint that you tried to cancel yours (and doing so on usenet is
spectacularly unreliable).
> individual and if you are defending someone who is reminding me the
> mistake made by me that was immediately removed while his remarks were
> made 4 hours later than someone has a problem and that someone is not
> me.
I was simply pointing out why it was commented upon (since that
appeared to have escaped notice), and trying to do so in a very gentle
and non-threatening/non-insulting way (or so I thought!).
--
Steve Foster
|
