Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: agreements ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 7 Topic 8626 of 9136
Post > Topic >>

Re: agreements vs. Michaels

by "Lorne" <lorne_anderson@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 29, 2008 at 01:41 AM

"David Babcock" <dpb3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:ae344554-80c0-4c76-8cd5-f94d3145f250@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What is standard practice and/or your preferred agreement on these
> questions, assuming that you open 1S as dealer (matchpoints, both
> vul), your LHO bids 2S Michaels, and pard doubles to show a desire to
> defend against at least one possible enemy suit:
>
> 1.  If advancer bids 3H, or 3C pass/correct which overcaller p*****,
> is this forcing on pard in passout seat?

yes - if it is not forcing you are forced to bid with extra values and 
little in the trump suit and hence will miss a profitable penalty if
partner 
has it.

>
> 2.  If overcaller converts the pass/correct bid to 3D and pard p*****,
> is this forcing on you?
>

Yes - this is similar to 1 except now if you play it NF then responder has

to bid with a good hand and little in the trump suit.

> 3.  Does double of advancer's 3H by you show an interest in defending,
> or extra values?  If the former, how do you show extra values, or do
> you ignore those for the moment (dicey if the answer to (1) is "no")?
>

You want to defend.  With values and no defensive interest you pass then 
take out partners double.

With a minimum hand that does not want to defend you bid straight away.

> Your hand is  AJxxx  AK  xx  AKxx .  What is your call over advancer's
> 3H?

I would double.  If partner has a penalty of both minors you could be in 
trouble (missing 5/6C whilst 3H is close to making) but most of the time
it 
will be right.  I lead A and another spade then give partner a spade ruff 
when in with the first trump (maybe ca****ng club(s) first after seeing 
dummy).
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
agreements vs. Michaels
David Babcock <dpb3@[E  2008-04-28 08:41:28 
Re: agreements vs. Michaels
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S  2008-04-28 11:58:21 
Re: agreements vs. Michaels
Michael Angelo Ravera <  2008-04-28 12:36:01 
Re: agreements vs. Michaels
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-04-28 12:38:06 
Re: agreements vs. Michaels
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-28 14:51:17 
Re: agreements vs. Michaels
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-04-28 16:32:21 
Re: agreements vs. Michaels
"Lorne" <lor  2008-04-29 01:41:10 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 9:42:46 CDT 2008.