

|
 |
| Gaming > Bridge > Re: S:JT H:KT63... |
|
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 10 of 43 Topic 8627 of 9135
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: S:JT H:KT63 D:A72 C:9764, ok, what happens next...?
by Histriadogsilver <andjelka.richter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Apr 28, 2008 at 04:24 PM
| On Apr 28, 7:33 pm, Histriadogsilver <andjelka.rich...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> West North East South
> ------ 1H p 2H ( constructive raise otherwise 1N F1
> with subsequent 2H rebid)
> p 2S!! p ?
>
> The bid of 2S!! is showing a shortness somewhere. What do you do now?
>
> A.) You ask with 2N since you are interested in knowing in which suit
> the shortness is
> B.) You deny the invitation with 3H since your hand has minimum values
> for the shown raise
> C.) You just blast to game
>
> I'll show you partner's hand later.
>
> Boris
North made an aggressive move toward game, his partner knew he would
have bid game with almost any 14 hcp's hand and since the balanced
14-16 hcps hands are opened with 1N in the bidding system they were
playing South can't expect much more than a 12-13 hcps hand with a
side singleton. Still, he has obviously working values and four card
sup****t. That suffices to investigate a seemingly unlikely game.
What would you have bid with North's hand? ( S:A865 H:QJ982 D:KQ3 C:
2 )
What would you have bid with South's hand? ( S:JT H:KT63 D:A72 C:9764)
Well, just for the record it went:
West North East South
------ 1H p 2H
p 2S! p 2N!
p 3C! p 4H
All pass
2S! =3D any singleton or void
2N! =3D asking about the location of that singleton or void
3C! =3D club singleton or void
West's hand was: S:Q23 H:A5 D:T865 C.AQ83
East's hand was: S:K974 H:74 D: J94 C:KJT5
10 easy tricks were made!
At the other table it went:
1H =96 p - 3D (inverted 'Bergen raises') =96 p =96 3H All pass.
Good hand evaluation by you all, however there are still a few pagans
out there:-)
Thank you all
Cheers
Boris Richter


|
43 Posts in Topic:
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-28 10:33:53 |
|
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-04-28 12:29:54 |
|
Will in New Haven <bil |
2008-04-28 12:47:56 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-28 12:50:09 |
|
hoffman@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-04-28 12:58:28 |
|
Charles Brenner <cbren |
2008-04-28 12:59:35 |
|
"raija d" <m |
2008-04-28 18:01:54 |
|
Eric Leong <ewleongusa |
2008-04-28 13:30:46 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-28 13:54:21 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-28 16:24:10 |
|
"Lorne" <lor |
2008-04-29 01:53:31 |
|
"Kieran Dyke" & |
2008-04-29 15:01:19 |
|
Charles Brenner <cbren |
2008-04-28 22:22:47 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 03:06:48 |
|
Eric Leong <ewleongusa |
2008-04-29 03:11:09 |
|
"Kieran Dyke" & |
2008-04-29 21:41:03 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 03:43:47 |
|
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-04-29 04:19:55 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 04:25:30 |
|
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-04-29 05:04:10 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 05:22:48 |
|
"Thomas Dehn" & |
2008-04-29 20:01:43 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-29 12:57:35 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 13:43:49 |
|
"Thomas Dehn" & |
2008-04-30 19:28:08 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-29 13:45:36 |
|
Bob Lipton <boblipton@ |
2008-04-29 17:14:44 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 14:50:56 |
|
Charles Brenner <cbren |
2008-04-29 15:42:41 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-29 17:11:05 |
|
ted <morristed@[EMAIL |
2008-04-29 20:22:13 |
|
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-04-29 20:42:59 |
|
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-04-30 10:50:17 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-30 11:53:03 |
|
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[ |
2008-04-30 13:39:34 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-30 14:18:35 |
|
Bob Lipton <boblipton@ |
2008-04-30 17:30:10 |
|
"raija d" <m |
2008-04-30 14:45:45 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-30 14:35:00 |
|
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-05-01 16:40:56 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-05-01 17:37:56 |
|
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S |
2008-05-01 17:56:41 |
|
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-05-01 18:12:43 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|