

|
 |
| Gaming > Bridge > Re: S:JT H:KT63... |
|
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 4 of 43 Topic 8627 of 9128
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: S:JT H:KT63 D:A72 C:9764, ok, what happens next...?
by Andrew <agumperz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Apr 28, 2008 at 12:50 PM
| On Apr 28, 10:33 am, Histriadogsilver <andjelka.rich...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> West North East South
> ------ 1H p 2H ( constructive raise otherwise 1N F1
> with subsequent 2H rebid)
> p 2S!! p ?
>
> The bid of 2S!! is showing a shortness somewhere. What do you do now?
>
> A.) You ask with 2N since you are interested in knowing in which suit
> the shortness is
> B.) You deny the invitation with 3H since your hand has minimum values
> for the shown raise
> C.) You just blast to game
>
> I'll show you partner's hand later.
>
> Boris
I am glad I bid 2H instead of making partner guess by using a Bergen
3C. Now I ask for the shortness. If opener has a minor suit singleton,
I have an obvious game bid. If opener has shortness in spades, I will
sign off in 3H.
The key to the hand is the short suit total (total of length in the
partner****p's two shortest suits). If partner has a minor suit
singleton, then the short suit total is 3. With a short suit total of
3, I will require only 20 working HCP to make game (of which I can
provide 7 or 8 working HCP).
If instead partner has a stiff spade, then the short suit total is
probably 4 (since my doubleton spade is wasted and the partner****p's
next shortest suit is probably 3). With a short suit total of 4, the
partner****p will require an extra working king to make game. Since I
have only 7 working HCP, opener will need approximately 16 HCP outside
of spades and 16 HCP plus a stiff is a game bid, not an invite.
Andrew


|
43 Posts in Topic:
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-28 10:33:53 |
|
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-04-28 12:29:54 |
|
Will in New Haven <bil |
2008-04-28 12:47:56 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-28 12:50:09 |
|
hoffman@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-04-28 12:58:28 |
|
Charles Brenner <cbren |
2008-04-28 12:59:35 |
|
"raija d" <m |
2008-04-28 18:01:54 |
|
Eric Leong <ewleongusa |
2008-04-28 13:30:46 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-28 13:54:21 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-28 16:24:10 |
|
"Lorne" <lor |
2008-04-29 01:53:31 |
|
"Kieran Dyke" & |
2008-04-29 15:01:19 |
|
Charles Brenner <cbren |
2008-04-28 22:22:47 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 03:06:48 |
|
Eric Leong <ewleongusa |
2008-04-29 03:11:09 |
|
"Kieran Dyke" & |
2008-04-29 21:41:03 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 03:43:47 |
|
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-04-29 04:19:55 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 04:25:30 |
|
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-04-29 05:04:10 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 05:22:48 |
|
"Thomas Dehn" & |
2008-04-29 20:01:43 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-29 12:57:35 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 13:43:49 |
|
"Thomas Dehn" & |
2008-04-30 19:28:08 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-29 13:45:36 |
|
Bob Lipton <boblipton@ |
2008-04-29 17:14:44 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-29 14:50:56 |
|
Charles Brenner <cbren |
2008-04-29 15:42:41 |
|
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI |
2008-04-29 17:11:05 |
|
ted <morristed@[EMAIL |
2008-04-29 20:22:13 |
|
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-04-29 20:42:59 |
|
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-04-30 10:50:17 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-30 11:53:03 |
|
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[ |
2008-04-30 13:39:34 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-30 14:18:35 |
|
Bob Lipton <boblipton@ |
2008-04-30 17:30:10 |
|
"raija d" <m |
2008-04-30 14:45:45 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-04-30 14:35:00 |
|
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-05-01 16:40:56 |
|
Histriadogsilver <andj |
2008-05-01 17:37:56 |
|
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S |
2008-05-01 17:56:41 |
|
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC |
2008-05-01 18:12:43 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|