Re: Quick question for any directors out there please.

darren.cotterell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:
>Ok - just checked out a couple of resources and both say Kx is 1 loser
>- can't see that myself - I've always counted it as 2 - how can Kx be
>1 loser and Ax one loser?

Because these sorts of artifacts occur when you try to use an
evaluation tool that re****ts things in whole numbers.  The basic
LTC has flaws, and is more along the lines of a helpful guideline
than a recipe to be followed by rote.

> Maybe Kx 1.5 losers and QTxx 2.5.

Yes, there are various adjustments you can make; see Google :-)