Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > agreements vs. ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 7 Topic 8626 of 8696
Post > Topic >>

agreements vs. Michaels

by David Babcock <dpb3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 28, 2008 at 08:41 AM

What is standard practice and/or your preferred agreement on these
questions, assuming that you open 1S as dealer (matchpoints, both
vul), your LHO bids 2S Michaels, and pard doubles to show a desire to
defend against at least one possible enemy suit:

1.  If advancer bids 3H, or 3C pass/correct which overcaller passes,
is this forcing on pard in passout seat?

2.  If overcaller converts the pass/correct bid to 3D and pard passes,
is this forcing on you?

3.  Does double of advancer's 3H by you show an interest in defending,
or extra values?  If the former, how do you show extra values, or do
you ignore those for the moment (dicey if the answer to (1) is "no")?

Your hand is  AJxxx  AK  xx  AKxx .  What is your call over advancer's
3H?

TIA.

David




 7 Posts in Topic:
agreements vs. Michaels
David Babcock <dpb3@[E  2008-04-28 08:41:28 
Re: agreements vs. Michaels
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S  2008-04-28 11:58:21 
Re: agreements vs. Michaels
Michael Angelo Ravera <  2008-04-28 12:36:01 
Re: agreements vs. Michaels
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-04-28 12:38:06 
Re: agreements vs. Michaels
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-28 14:51:17 
Re: agreements vs. Michaels
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-04-28 16:32:21 
Re: agreements vs. Michaels
"Lorne" <lor  2008-04-29 01:41:10 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue May 13 15:42:40 CDT 2008.