On Apr 28, 3:55 am, StevieTee <ste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 27, 6:46 pm, Histriadogsilver <andjelka.rich...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Right, but what is your partnership going to do with:
>
> > Ax KJ9xx
> > xx x
> > KQxx Axx
> > AKQxx 10xxx
>
> > How do you bid this hand?
>
> > Opener Responder
> > 1c 1s
> > 2d 2s
> > 3h 4c
> > ? (and now what? Do you bid 4N RKCB for clubs, is 4D or 4H a specific
> > RKCB agreement? How do you start a cue-bidding sequence for clubs?)
>
> > Cheers
> > Boris
>
> Opener Responder
> 1C 1S
> 2D 2S
> 3H 4C
> 4D* 4H*
> 4S** 5D***
> 6C pass
>
> *Italian cue-bid (1st or 2nd round control)
> **Could be a cue-bid, or could suggest a place to play; depends
> on your understandings
> ***This hand is obviously going to go to slam on this sequence,
> with 4-card club support and controls in all 3 of the other suits
>
> Seems pretty straightforward to me....
>
> Steve Sun
I may not be right even though I strongly believe I am. Staying low is
generally better, what if responder is 5=2=4=4? That is why I think
this is a better approach:
Opener Responder
1C 1S
2D 2S
3C (not promising a six card suit but more importantly in my
opinion staying low , giving partner some bidding room to express
himself)
Nevertheless I am not strongly objecting your partnership agreements,
just suggesting another approach.
Cheers
|
