"John R. Mayne" <jrmayne@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:2e234776-f3e9-4911-954c-3f54d1c14707@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr 25, 1:23 am, Jan Veerbeek <jbveerb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> IMP's
> East/ all white
>
> Your hand:
> S A K 10 9 8 5 2
> H K J 6 5
> D 2
> C Q
>
> The bidding:
> West North East South
> -- --- 1C* pass
> 1H** ?
>
> 1C = 2+ card C, no 5-card major, 11-19 HCP
> 1H = Transfer Walsh, 4+card S and 6+ HCP
>
> Well, what will be Your action and why?
>
> Jan Veerbeek
My agreements are that 1S is takeout and double is power here; I
probably have to wait and bid spades on the back side; the hand seems
too strong for an offense-only 3S bid, and too scary for a 4S bid
solo.
If I had different (better?) agreements, obviously I'd do whatever
they called for.
--JRM
If you played that (1C) P (1S) 2S is spades, then assumedly (1C) P (1H xfr
to S) 1S would also be spades. Admittedly, the 1C opening is not a "club
suit" so perhaps this is not the same situation as when the opponents
have
"bid two suits".
Raija
|
