Re: great idea -- explain own bids

dranon wrote
>On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:31:18 +0100, David Stevenson
><bridge2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>dranon wrote
>>>On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:26:07 +0100, David Stevenson
>>><bridge2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>   If Hamman and Weichsel play a standardised expert treatment then
they
>>>>have an implicit agreement when they first sit down, which must be
>>>>disclosed, and has nothing to do with the main thrust of this thread,
>>>>which is what to do when there is no such agreement.
>>>
>>>I'm saying that implicit agreements are more than likely in play when
>>>you don't think they are.  Somehow I think you are just being a troll
>>>on this issue.
>>
>>   Why?  You have changed your argument from "Let's tell opponents our
>>agreements whether we have one or not" to "I was only talking about
>>implicit agreements" - which you clearly were not - and you accuse *me*
>>of being a troll?
>
>I had never stated, and will never state, that which you attribute to
>me.  That was the OP, not me.
>
>Troll.

   I am sorry, I did not know your name was 'troll'.

   Could you not change it?

-- 
David Stevenson           Bridge      RTFLB       Cats       Railways
Liverpool, England, UK    Fax: +44 870 055 7697        ICQ:  20039682
<webjak666@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                             bluejak on OKB
                           Bridgepage: http://blakjak.org/brg_menu.htm