Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Deep Finess...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 21 of 21 Topic 8609 of 9135
Post > Topic >>

Re: Deep Finesse gets this right

by vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 24, 2008 at 07:40 PM

On Apr 24, 6:52 pm, Bob <rfr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Steve Willner wrote:
> > But it's harder when you can't see all the cards....
>
> >    Dealer East
> >    NS Vul
> >    IMP Pairs
>
> >            North
> >            K75
> >            AK62
> >            76432
> >            3
> >    West               East
> >    JT62               -
> >    QT97               J4
> >    QT                 AKJ8
> >    764                AQJ9852
> >            South
> >            AQ9843
> >            853
> >            95
> >            KT
> >    West   North  East   South
> >                  1C!    1S
> >    Pass!  2S     3C     Pass
> >    Pass   3H     Pass   3S
> >    Dbl    All Pass
>
> > 1C was strong and artificial; West's pass showed any bad hand (less
than
> > a decent 5-count).  NS have no two-suited methods over the strong
club;
> > their bidding was natural.
>
> > Q1. What do you think of the bidding, especially by EW?
>
> > West led C-4 (count leads).  East played C-A and three rounds of
> > diamonds, declarer ruffing with S-9 and West discarding H-7 (low
> > encourages).  Declarer drew three rounds of trumps ending in dummy and
> > ruffed a diamond; the only additional trick for the defense was West's
> > high trump.
>
> > Deep Finesse says the double-dummy result is 8 tricks.  As far as I
can
> > tell, the defense achieves this only by switching to hearts before
> > playing the third round of diamonds.
>
> > Q2. Can defenders beat the contract without a peek?  How?  Assign the
> > blame, if you will.
>
> I, poor defender, would be tempted to play diamonds. Unlikely, but
> partner might have a singleton. With a doubleton, it might give
> partner a trump promotion. These are not likely, but declarer having
> three hearts 108x or worse is a hope too.
>
> Hindsight, but I wonder if an inference can be drawn from the diamond
> plays. Perhaps West should signal Q10 for a diamond continuation and
> 10Q if the diamond continuation doesn't help his trump holding. Beyond
> my ability at the table, but I could imagine experts doing it.

West would lead a diamond with a singleton.
 




 21 Posts in Topic:
Deep Finesse gets this right
Steve Willner <swillne  2008-04-23 22:43:07 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Douglas Newlands <dan0  2008-04-24 03:19:21 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
RayYuenger@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-24 00:26:48 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-24 00:55:00 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
ian.payn@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-24 02:19:10 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-04-24 03:59:15 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
ian.payn@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-24 06:35:22 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
rhm <rhm@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-24 04:02:28 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-04-24 07:55:03 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 09:21:50 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[  2008-04-24 09:56:36 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-04-24 15:32:46 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Adam Beneschan <adam@[  2008-04-24 14:03:24 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Steve Willner <swillne  2008-04-24 21:48:22 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-04-24 22:28:51 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Steve Willner <swillne  2008-04-25 08:59:10 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
rhm <rhm@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-25 00:52:47 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-25 01:29:21 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Adam Beneschan <adam@[  2008-04-25 12:45:43 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Bob <rfrick@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-24 18:52:19 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 19:40:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 2:50:39 CDT 2008.