Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Mis-defend ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 16 of 23 Topic 8605 of 9128
Post > Topic >>

Re: Mis-defend this hand with me

by Histriadogsilver <andjelka.richter@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 24, 2008 at 06:30 PM

On Apr 24, 7:33 pm, Histriadogsilver <andjelka.rich...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On Apr 24, 6:03 pm, Travis Crump <pretz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > henrysun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > > On Apr 23, 5:45 am, henrysun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > >> You hold
>
> > >> AK6432
> > >> x
> > >> Q98xx
> > >> Q
>
> > >> Red vs red at imp pairs against unknown opponents.
>
> > >> You decide to open 1s and hear this auction:
>
> > >> You       LHO       Pd     RHO
> > >> 1s         2h           p       p
> > >> 2s         3h           x       all pass
>
> > >> Partner leads the JS and dummy hits with:
>
> > >> T875
> > >> 9x
> > >> Axxxx
> > >> xx
>
> > >> Trick 1:  Spade J, five, king, queen
> > >> Trick 2: ??
>
> > >> what do you play at trick 2, and how do you propose to beat 3hx?
>
> > >> More anon (which means, 'more later," an archaic english
expression,
> > >> since it has been communicated to me that anon might be
misunderstood
> > >> as an acronym; see the online OED for details.)
>
> > >> Henrysun909
>
> > > Thanks to all who replied (and none of whom, really, misdefended the
> > > hand with me.).  The entire hand was something like
>
> > >                     J
> > >                     T8xx
> > >                     KJ
> > >                      AJ9xxx
>
> > > Q9                                T875
> > > AKQJxx                         9x
> > > x                                   Axxxx
> > > KTxx                              xx
>
> > >                    AK6432
> > >                    x
> > >                    Qxxxx
> > >                    Q
>
> > > trick 1:  Spade J, 5, K, Q
> > > self-rationalization:  i wonder if partner led from the J9 of spades
> > > or a singleton.  If he led from the J9 of spades and I try to cash
the
> > > Ace, I've just set up two spade winners for declarer.  I'd better
find
> > > out if he led a singleton or not.
>
> > > trick 2:  Club Q, K, T, small
> > > trick 3:  Club J, small, small diamond, small
>
> > > self-rationalization:  if partner wanted a spade lead back, he would
> > > have led low instead of high.  He must therefore not want a spade
> > > ruff, so it must be declarer who has the stiff Q.  Lucky for me I
> > > didn't set up two spade winners for him at trick 2!!
>
> > > trick 4: Club small, heart 9, small spade, small club
>
> > > self-immolation:  whoops!  I have a sneaking suspicion we've gone
from
> > > +500 to -730 in the space of 2 tricks
>
> > > And so it came to pass that declarer took 6 hearts, a ruff, the AD,
> > > and the K of clubs when we could have taken the AS, spade ruff,
heart
> > > ****ft (won in dummy), club to ace, heart (no more club ruffs for
> > > declarer), etc.
>
> > > Anyway, congratulations to those who scored up +500.  You can
consider
> > > yourselves +14 imps next time we play.
>
> > > Henrysun909
>
> > Did anyone get it right?  It seems everyone returned a trump[as would
I]
> > leading to 6 hearts, 2 spades, and the AD.
>
> > Travis
>
> What about leading the trump immediately, it is obvious that declarer
> is bidding on shape, how is he going to ruff all those diamonds, clubs
> and spades without our help. And anyway the spade ace is the only sure
> entry in hand I have, partner would not have doubled easily without
> both side suits well stopped and he is likely to have them well
> locked. He knows from the bidding that the spade suit is six card long
> but he won't double that easily if he is afraid they have possibly a
> running side suit.
>
> Boris

Sick:-)

End-played once again:-)

Boris
 




 23 Posts in Topic:
Mis-defend this hand with me
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-23 05:45:39 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-04-23 06:06:48 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-23 06:13:01 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-04-23 10:24:29 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
dancle16@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-23 08:22:24 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-04-23 17:33:38 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-23 21:04:19 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
"Steve Foster"   2008-04-24 11:21:06 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-04-24 02:00:00 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
Rob Tamlyn <xtamlyn@[E  2008-04-24 08:03:17 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
"Steve Foster"   2008-04-24 11:28:20 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-24 07:30:23 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
Travis Crump <pretzalz  2008-04-24 16:03:00 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[  2008-04-24 09:40:28 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-24 10:33:51 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-24 18:30:50 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-25 05:18:34 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-25 09:11:37 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
markhj111@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-25 10:38:29 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
StevieTee <stevts@[EMA  2008-04-25 15:59:53 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-25 17:37:22 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-26 01:54:07 
Re: Mis-defend this hand with me
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-26 05:01:55 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 7:43:07 CDT 2008.