Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Deep Finess...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 21 Topic 8609 of 9105
Post > Topic >>

Re: Deep Finesse gets this right

by Adam Beneschan <adam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 24, 2008 at 02:03 PM

On Apr 23, 7:43 pm, Steve Willner <swill...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> But it's harder when you can't see all the cards....
>
>    Dealer East
>    NS Vul
>    IMP Pairs
>
>            North
>            K75
>            AK62
>            76432
>            3
>    West               East
>    JT62               -
>    QT97               J4
>    QT                 AKJ8
>    764                AQJ9852
>            South
>            AQ9843
>            853
>            95
>            KT
>    West   North  East   South
>                  1C!    1S
>    Pass!  2S     3C     Pass
>    Pass   3H     Pass   3S
>    Dbl    All Pass
>
>
> Q2. Can defenders beat the contract without a peek?  How?  Assign the
> blame, if you will.

What was East trying to accomplish by the diamond plays?  Did he have
a plan for beating the contract, and an idea of how diamond leads were
going to help accomplish this?  Or did he just see a bunch of high
diamonds in his hand and stop thinking at that point?

                                  -- Adam
 




 21 Posts in Topic:
Deep Finesse gets this right
Steve Willner <swillne  2008-04-23 22:43:07 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Douglas Newlands <dan0  2008-04-24 03:19:21 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
RayYuenger@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-24 00:26:48 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-24 00:55:00 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
ian.payn@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-24 02:19:10 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-04-24 03:59:15 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
ian.payn@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-24 06:35:22 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
rhm <rhm@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-24 04:02:28 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-04-24 07:55:03 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 09:21:50 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[  2008-04-24 09:56:36 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-04-24 15:32:46 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Adam Beneschan <adam@[  2008-04-24 14:03:24 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Steve Willner <swillne  2008-04-24 21:48:22 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-04-24 22:28:51 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Steve Willner <swillne  2008-04-25 08:59:10 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
rhm <rhm@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-25 00:52:47 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-25 01:29:21 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Adam Beneschan <adam@[  2008-04-25 12:45:43 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Bob <rfrick@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-24 18:52:19 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 19:40:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 20 0:32:42 CDT 2008.