Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Deep Finess...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 21 Topic 8609 of 9105
Post > Topic >>

Re: Deep Finesse gets this right

by ian.payn@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 24, 2008 at 02:19 AM

On Apr 24, 3:43=A0am, Steve Willner <swill...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
> Deep Finesse says the double-dummy result is 8 tricks. =A0As far as I
can
> tell, the defense achieves this only by switching to hearts before
> playing the third round of diamonds.

++++Or indeed the second round of Diamonds. Or the first round of
Diamonds.
>
> Q2. Can defenders beat the contract without a peek? =A0How? =A0Assign
the
> blame, if you will.

++++Whilst I wouldn't claim that a Heart switch was automatic, I'm not
sure that cra****ng down three rounds of a suit, all but setting up a
dummy with at least two entries staring you in the face, is exactly
"optimum" defence...The bidding more or less precludes any hand on
which this can work [I know that's curt and dismissive but I am pushed
for time. I'll leave Eric to work out fifteen different hands on which
this defence will fail].
 




 21 Posts in Topic:
Deep Finesse gets this right
Steve Willner <swillne  2008-04-23 22:43:07 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Douglas Newlands <dan0  2008-04-24 03:19:21 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
RayYuenger@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-24 00:26:48 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-24 00:55:00 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
ian.payn@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-24 02:19:10 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-04-24 03:59:15 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
ian.payn@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-24 06:35:22 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
rhm <rhm@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-24 04:02:28 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-04-24 07:55:03 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 09:21:50 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
OldPalooka <ashutts1@[  2008-04-24 09:56:36 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-04-24 15:32:46 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Adam Beneschan <adam@[  2008-04-24 14:03:24 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Steve Willner <swillne  2008-04-24 21:48:22 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-04-24 22:28:51 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Steve Willner <swillne  2008-04-25 08:59:10 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
rhm <rhm@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-25 00:52:47 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-25 01:29:21 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Adam Beneschan <adam@[  2008-04-25 12:45:43 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
Bob <rfrick@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-24 18:52:19 
Re: Deep Finesse gets this right
vspoker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 19:40:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 20 0:25:15 CDT 2008.