Re: great idea -- explain own bids

dranon wrote
>On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:26:07 +0100, David Stevenson
><bridge2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>>   If Hamman and Weichsel play a standardised expert treatment then they
>>have an implicit agreement when they first sit down, which must be
>>disclosed, and has nothing to do with the main thrust of this thread,
>>which is what to do when there is no such agreement.
>
>I'm saying that implicit agreements are more than likely in play when
>you don't think they are.  Somehow I think you are just being a troll
>on this issue.

   Why?  You have changed your argument from "Let's tell opponents our 
agreements whether we have one or not" to "I was only talking about 
implicit agreements" - which you clearly were not - and you accuse *me* 
of being a troll?

-- 
David Stevenson           Bridge      RTFLB       Cats       Railways
Liverpool, England, UK    Fax: +44 870 055 7697        ICQ:  20039682
<webjak666@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                             bluejak on OKB
                           Bridgepage: http://blakjak.org/brg_menu.htm