Re: great idea -- explain own bids

In article <hlju049a1dakf4ebloi86i2a16dq3o9m1r@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Kent Feiler  <zzzz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
....
>What's the problem with this?  Is the 4C opener's side being
>insufficiently punished for not knowing what they were doing?  That
>doesn't apply to any other part of bridge.  If a declarer plays a hand
>badly and, as a result, gets a good score, nobody calls the director
>and complains.  This situation seems the same.

I agree with most of what you say, except for one thing.
Your suggested utopia seems to assume a real partner****p in a real game.

As you can probably guess, most of my online play is in fleeting
partner****ps.  My position throughout has been that the opps aren't
entitled to know any more about my bids than my pd does.