Re: great idea -- explain own bids

"dranon" <dranon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:grgu04tj5da3g8ok6rl1g90gkkjl8g2hms@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Snipped long discussion)

dranon wrote about Cappelletti 2D bid:
>
> I would say that if an individual made it with 44 it would be a misbid
> in context, not MI.

*** You are mistaken.
There are people who play Capp and say 4-4 is adequate. They have so
agreed 
with their partners - if there was time before game, or they have a CC, or

it came up during a session and was clarified as 4-4.   It would not be a 
misbid.
{I am not one of them, BTW, and I am not going to discuss the merits or 
disadvantages of 4-4 here}
Raija
***

(Snipped more discussion between David Stevenson and dranon)

dranon describes David S here:

> Somehow I think you are just being a troll on this issue.

*** You are mistaken again, oh you anonymous one.
I don't know the man personally, but David Stevenson is a respected and 
knowledgeable expert in the laws and regulations of bridge in his own 
country as well as internationally.  I know I know, he does not need me or

anyone else to "defend" him, but I just could not keep quiet when you said

he is being a troll on the issue.
Raija