Re: self-explanations and self-alerts

dranon wrote
>"Random bids" is not my idea of a partner****p that can be defended
>against.  Why not have two dradles?  One 7 sided and the other 4
>sided.  Spin them both and bid whatever they say.  Respin if it ends
>up being too low.  No, wait.  Why not just allow insufficient bids to
>be determined by the spin, too?  Barring partner should add some more
>thrust and parry.

  Certainly not.  Let us pass a Law that everyone *must* bid the way you
do, without exception.  That'll be fun - I don't think.

  What have you got against bridge the way it is played?

-- 
David Stevenson           Bridge      RTFLB       Cats       Railways
Liverpool, England, UK    Fax: +44 870 055 7697        ICQ:  20039682
<webjak666@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                             bluejak on OKB
                          Bridgepage: http://blakjak.org/brg_menu.htm