Re: self-explanations and self-alerts

On Apr 21, 11:43=A0pm, dranon <dra...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:07:56 -0400, CBFalconer <cbfalco...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> >dranon wrote:
> >> dranon <dra...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >... snip ...
>
> >>> I do not allow the opps to hide behind such folderol.
>
> >> For example, an opening bid of 2c, inquired and responded with "No
> >> agreement" would be dealt with swiftly (at least, if I am host).
>
> >Ridiculous. =A0With no agreement either responder or opponent is
> >entitled to come to whatever conclusions their little minds
> >envision. =A0There is no requirement that the conclusions be
> >correct. =A0There is also no requirement that either detail what
> >conclusions they came to.
>
> So, you like playing "not bridge", huh?

Does the League still award those secret master points for driving
people out of the game?

--
Will in New Haven