Re: self-explanations and self-alerts

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:07:56 -0400, CBFalconer <cbfalconer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>dranon wrote:
>> dranon <dranon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>... snip ...
>>
>>> I do not allow the opps to hide behind such folderol.
>> 
>> For example, an opening bid of 2c, inquired and responded with "No
>> agreement" would be dealt with swiftly (at least, if I am host).
>
>Ridiculous.  With no agreement either responder or opponent is
>entitled to come to whatever conclusions their little minds
>envision.  There is no requirement that the conclusions be
>correct.  There is also no requirement that either detail what
>conclusions they came to.

So, you like playing "not bridge", huh?