Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge > Re: Pass-out de...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 33 Topic 8587 of 9105
Post > Topic >>

Re: Pass-out decision

by Eric Leong <ewleongusa@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 21, 2008 at 09:31 AM

On Apr 20, 7:06=A0pm, "raija d" <musti...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Local sectional IMPs, solid average+ opponents and partner.
>
> RHO opens first seat. We are vul, they are not.
>
> RHO =A0 You =A0 LHO =A0 Pd
> 2H =A0 =A0 =A0 P =A0 =A0 =A0 3H =A0 =A0 =A0 P
> P =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ?
>
> Your hand:
> Q109xx-xxx-J-AQ10x
>
> What is your call?
> Second choice(s) if any?
> And reasoning?
>
> TIA
> Raija

I would bid 3S for the following reasons:

1. Partner is marked with some cards since LHO didn't bid or
investigate game. So at worst, I would place partner
    with about 9 hcp at least.
2. Partner is marked with about two hearts or less given LHO's raise.
LHO is less likely to raise on a singleton and
    cards to risk going for a minus when 2H is making.
3. With heart shortness partner is more likely to have some spades.
4. LHO is very unlikely to have a spade stack. With a spade stack he
would want to make it easier for the
    opponents to come in at the two level. Also, why would he risk
going down in 3H if his side could play in 2H
    making exactly two?
5. I hold both the spade ten and nine so since the opponents are
certain not to have good intermediates in the
    trump suit, it is less likely LHO will double looking at great
trumps. Also, the spade intermediates makes it
    more likely I can pick up the suit for no loss when partner has
something like  S AJxx.
6. Game is quite possible. Give partner something like:  S Kxxx  H x
D xxxx  C Kxxx and you would want
    to be in 4S but partner could have more like:  S Kxxx  H xx  D
Axxx  C Kxx. I am not saying partner will
    always raise to 4S when it is correct however he will some of the
time with his even better hands.
7. Even if our side doesn't get to 4S it is still possible 3S will
make and 3H will make so our side avoids
    an adverse part score swing.
8. If 3S goes down an undoubled trick or two it will either be a small
loss or a small gain when 3H is making.
9. There is a small gain when 3S makes and 3H doesn't make.
10. In the worst case if LHO doubles 3S, I don't think partner is
going to sit for 3Sx when you are backing
     into the bidding. For example, give partner   S x   H xx  D
AQxxx   C Kxxxx, I would think he would bid 3NT to
     tell me to pick a minor especially since when I backed into the
bidding I should have some shape and suggests
     that there is an alternative place to play.
11. Finally, the 3H bid suggests more that LHO is trying to keep our
side from something rather than trying to trap
     us because with a 13-14 hcp count and some spades, LHO could just
pass 2H and play it there for a plus score
     when 3H might go down.

So in short, I think bidding 3S has the upside for a possible game or
part score swing while the downside is more likely to relatively
small.

Eric Leong
 




 33 Posts in Topic:
Pass-out decision
"raija d" <m  2008-04-20 19:06:30 
Re: Pass-out decision
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-20 19:19:18 
Re: Pass-out decision
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-20 19:40:04 
Re: Pass-out decision
"Kieran Dyke" &  2008-04-21 13:03:03 
Re: Pass-out decision
Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S  2008-04-20 20:25:02 
Re: Pass-out decision
ted <morristed@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 20:41:17 
Re: Pass-out decision
Dave Flower <DavJFlowe  2008-04-21 01:27:38 
Re: Pass-out decision
dake50@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-21 05:09:49 
Re: Pass-out decision
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-21 05:14:04 
Re: Pass-out decision
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-21 07:45:29 
Re: Pass-out decision
"raija d" <m  2008-04-21 08:07:57 
Re: Pass-out decision
rhm <rhm@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-21 09:02:09 
Re: Pass-out decision
Eric Leong <ewleongusa  2008-04-21 09:31:36 
Re: Pass-out decision
"raija d" <m  2008-04-21 10:50:21 
Re: Pass-out decision
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-21 11:18:59 
Re: Pass-out decision
Kevin Podsiadlik <KPod  2008-04-21 12:08:37 
Re: Pass-out decision
Stu Goodgold <stugo@[E  2008-04-21 12:25:30 
Re: Pass-out decision
"raija d" <m  2008-04-21 12:52:22 
Re: Pass-out decision
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-21 22:48:40 
Re: Pass-out decision
"raija d" <m  2008-04-21 23:32:52 
Re: Pass-out decision
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-21 23:51:59 
Re: Pass-out decision
Andrew <agumperz@[EMAI  2008-04-22 00:11:35 
Re: Pass-out decision
Will in New Haven <bil  2008-04-22 07:27:36 
Re: Pass-out decision
Kevin Podsiadlik <KPod  2008-04-22 13:32:05 
Re: Pass-out decision
"raija d" <m  2008-04-22 15:02:38 
Re: Pass-out decision
richlp <richlptx@[EMAI  2008-04-22 17:59:42 
Re: Pass-out decision
Histriadogsilver <andj  2008-04-23 01:49:03 
Re: Pass-out decision
Kevin Podsiadlik <KPod  2008-04-23 08:38:11 
Re: Pass-out decision
Will in New Haven <bil  2008-04-21 11:07:09 
Re: Pass-out decision
"raija d" <m  2008-04-21 11:40:58 
Re: Pass-out decision
hoffman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 11:55:37 
Re: Pass-out decision
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2008-04-21 23:24:08 
Re: Pass-out decision
Bob Lipton <boblipton@  2008-04-23 10:37:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 20 0:32:58 CDT 2008.