Re: great idea -- explain own bids

On Apr 21, 9:10=A0am, David Stevenson <brid...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>
> =A0 =A0I prefer to play by the Laws. =A0That way I ma not building some
un=
seen
> advantage for myself by not doing so.
>
> --
> David Stevenson =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Bridge =A0 =A0 =A0RTFLB =A0 =A0 =A0
Ca=
ts =A0 =A0 =A0 Railways
> Liverpool, England, UK =A0 =A0Fax: +44 870 055 7697 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ICQ:
=
=A020039682
> <webjak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
=A0=
 =A0 =A0 bluejak on OKB
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
=A0Bridgepage:http://b=
lakjak.org/brg_menu.htm

Nothing illegal here that I can see. Well, technically, it it is
probably a matter of proper procedure not to leave the table without
the director's permission, but that's a small point, right?

Again, if people would like to have an intelligent discussion of
legality, they need to cite laws. Otherwise we are stuck in a "no it
isn't" "yes it is" argument.

Here is a link to the old laws: http://web2.acbl.org/laws/index.html
Here is a link to the new laws:
http://www.ecatsbridge.com/do***ents/2007law=
s.asp