Re: great idea -- explain own bids

Bob wrote:

> I prefer the term "understanding". When I agree to play negative
> doubles through 3D, I have an understanding that they are not on if I
> open 1NT. Of course, my partner might not have that same
> understanding.

> Then, to rephrase the issue, in face to face bridge, I tell them my
> understanding of the meaning of my partner's bid. But my partner might
> have a different understanding. And my partner's understanding will
> more accurately describe partner's hand.

This is illegal.  If you pull this "understanding" crap at my table, the 
director is coming.

> I don't think the laws make any claim about which understanding the
> opps are entitled to, though obviously if I am asked I can give only
> my understanding.

Starting with your lack of understanding of the laws of bridge.