Re: WELOS: Webster's Extra-Light Opener System

<gandalfnf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1157563418.824781.193330@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> eleaticus wrote:

> Nick summarized your system fairly accurately and you complain.  This
> is the same summary that is on the internet if you look up WELOS.  Over
> half your post is the selling of an idea and not the sytem.  If Nick
> got the summary wrong, then please give us which line in summarized
> wrong.

Larrsen had it wrong. Hence that Nick had it wrong.

The responses can't be considered standard by any stretch, except, say,
1D-1H has the same min as standard. (I already commented on the
responses.)

There is no 11-15 count on anything.

And, why would 'you' try pre-empting a read of the actual material with a
copy of material by someone who you have no reason to think actually
knows?

--
eleaticus
ee-lee-AT-i-cus
eleaticus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Nick France
>