Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge okbridge > Re: Whoopee!
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 46 of 60 Topic 109 of 143
Post > Topic >>

Re: Whoopee!

by henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sep 5, 2006 at 07:00 PM

eleaticus wrote:
> "William Coleman" <rama****va@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:8LlLg.3613$v%4.3286@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "eleaticus" <eleaticus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:dG8Lg.32916$y7.19988@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > :I found out last night that there might be online site where I could
play
> > my
> > : super aggressive all-natural bridge bidding system, and tonight I
find
> it
> > is
> > : true of at least two sites!
> >
> > OMFG!!!  You are a bridge nut too???  You and I have a lot in common. 
I
> was
> > a bridge nut in my youth, but haven't played for many years.  My
regular
> > partner and I would alternate bidding systems when we played the same
> > opponents frequently in local and regional tournaments.
>
> I do NOT like poker. It falls so short of duplicate bridge.
>
> I hope they get into duplicate poker, hds up would be best. THEN we will
see
> some great  play.
>
> I LOVE duplicate, but when WELOS became illegal, well, nothing was
> comparatively fun anymore.
>
> > We would play Kaplan-Sheinwold in one tournament.
>
> One pair of great folk in Tallahassee was  the ... Gibbs?  They played
KS
> and were  the (second-place) opposition for correct contracts once I got
> into play with Jim Mahorner.
>
> My first duplicate ever, he took the card at one end of his spread,
placed
> it in the middle, removed a card right by it and placed it on the other
end.
> This during the bidding. I called the director  and said the man had a
> 6-5-1-1 hand, per what he had just done. Colonel Lowery looked and was
> highly amused and the professor (FSU, English) highly embarrassed.)
>
> I had played bridge once before, years before, and highly upset a Troy
> professor, but with an astounding bid at the six level, after they
> voluntarily bid to slam.
>
> >Then, the next
> > tournament, against basically the same players, we would play
Roth-Stone.
> > Needless to say, that created quite a bit of confusion among careless
> > players who didn't bother to check which bidding system we were
playing
> that
> > particular day.
>
> Earl Underwood and I played RS while 'touring' as Mayflower independent
and
> illegal helper.
>
> It was a lot of fun  and helped inform my super-aggressive/light opener
> WELOS.
>
> "Pre-balancing".
>
> I  delighted in all those occasions where we both passed, let the opp
open
> the bidding, and then deliberately get to solid game  bids.  The
'rhythm'
> was fun.
>
> >
> > How many master points do you have?  Let's compare dick sizes.
>
> LOL
>
> I was gonna say your mp 'dick' was as much bigger than mine than as your
> tummy was greater than mine, but then I saw your confession in another
post.
>
> I had close to 50 in my first 6 months or so, and probably registered
them,
> but I never registered any after that, as far as I can remember. In one
3
> month period I won every master point night in the area. I played very
> rarely in tourneys.
>
> And although a great partner with a fondness for the Moysean fit and
> short-pointed NT game play, I was not a  national standard card player,
by
> far I guess.
>
> --
> eleaticus
> ee-lee-AT-i-cus
> eleaticus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> >
> > William Coleman  (rama****va)
> >
> > Department of Agitation, Propaganda, and Demagoguery
> > ________________________

I note that there is still no system outline in this post.  It is hard
to evaluate something unseen, whether legal or not.

Henrysun909
 




 60 Posts in Topic:
OT: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 01:18:58 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"Porsche_Dan" &  2006-09-05 02:23:37 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"Gerben Dirksen"  2006-09-05 12:07:44 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 18:09:17 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
Otis Bricker <obricker  2006-09-05 06:55:06 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 18:16:58 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
Otis Bricker <obricker  2006-09-05 19:41:03 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
thissteve@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2006-09-05 06:13:58 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 18:18:32 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"John Crinnion"  2006-09-05 08:27:31 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 18:23:48 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2006-09-05 09:20:45 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 18:25:48 
Re: Whoopee!
"Susan" <sdb  2006-09-05 11:28:49 
Re: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 19:10:02 
Re: Whoopee!
Otis Bricker <obricker  2006-09-05 19:45:14 
Re: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 21:39:16 
Re: Whoopee!
Otis Bricker <obricker  2006-09-06 12:23:37 
Re: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-06 16:30:18 
Re: Whoopee!
Otis Bricker <obricker  2006-09-06 22:24:01 
Re: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-06 22:28:21 
Re: Whoopee!
"Bob" <bob@[  2006-09-05 09:56:07 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"Will in New Haven&q  2006-09-05 12:25:42 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 18:35:49 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"minus200(DELETETHIS  2006-09-05 23:05:25 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 23:10:17 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"minus200(DELETETHIS  2006-09-06 15:15:13 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-06 16:24:50 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"minus200(DELETETHIS  2006-09-05 15:37:17 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 18:49:21 
Re: Whoopee!
"William Coleman&quo  2006-09-05 21:12:36 
Re: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 19:28:55 
Re: Whoopee!
"Bob" <bob@[  2006-09-05 14:52:01 
Re: Whoopee!
"William Coleman&quo  2006-09-05 22:21:22 
Re: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 18:55:18 
Re: Whoopee!
"Bob" <bob@[  2006-09-05 15:30:44 
Re: Whoopee!
"Will in New Haven&q  2006-09-05 16:47:13 
Re: Whoopee!
michael@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-09-06 09:06:53 
Re: Whoopee!
"minus200(DELETETHIS  2006-09-06 15:31:31 
Re: Whoopee!
michael@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-09-07 08:45:49 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"Bob" <bob@[  2006-09-05 16:50:24 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 18:52:02 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
Rob Morris <rm445@[EMA  2006-09-06 11:16:09 
Re: Whoopee!
"Bob" <bob@[  2006-09-05 17:03:20 
Re: Whoopee!
"Will in New Haven&q  2006-09-05 18:29:16 
Re: Whoopee!
henrysun909@[EMAIL PROTEC  2006-09-05 19:00:38 
Re: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 21:37:11 
Re: Whoopee!
"Nigel" <nig  2006-09-05 19:04:41 
Re: Whoopee!
"Nigel" <nig  2006-09-05 19:21:50 
Re: Whoopee!
gandalfnf@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2006-09-05 19:39:05 
Re: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-05 21:44:25 
Re: Whoopee!
"Bob" <bob@[  2006-09-05 19:54:30 
Re: Whoopee!
"Nigel" <nig  2006-09-05 20:30:36 
Re: Whoopee!
"raija d" <m  2006-09-06 00:00:06 
Re: Whoopee!
gandalfnf@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2006-09-06 09:51:04 
Re: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-06 16:57:46 
Re: Whoopee!
gandalfnf@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2006-09-06 10:16:40 
Re: Whoopee!
"eleaticus" <  2006-09-06 17:00:00 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
"Adam Beneschan"  2006-09-06 14:33:54 
Re: OT: Whoopee!
Otis Bricker <obricker  2006-09-06 22:46:17 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 0:23:55 CDT 2008.