Re: OT: Whoopee!

"John Crinnion" <jcrinnion@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1157470051.108987.6350@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Why does your thread title designate this discussion as "Off-topic"?
>
> It is as on-topic as any thread along the lines of, say, the "I know I
> haven't enough points or playing tricks or whatever to open or respond
> or intervene or whatever but would it be all right if I did so?"
> variety.

LOL.

I was posting to my longterm ng, poker, and added the bridge groups as an
afterthought.

And without thought as to the OT in the subject.

Indeed, the article fetched an awful lot of response from the bridge
groups
what with the OT.
>
> Discount partner if you must - that is what he is there for - don't
> discount yourself.

Discounting myself where discounting is due is par for the course for me.
(However unlikely it is that a distracter wil notice!)

And a rec.gambling.poker interpreted the post in this way:

Translation: Look how smart I am!

Not quite a 'discounting' interpretation!

eleaticus
ee-lee-AT-i-cus







>
>
> eleaticus wrote:
>
> <SNIP>
>