"Barry Margolin" <barmar@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:barmar-7CFBDE.19291923032006@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <1143146439.311868.66910@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "Adam Beneschan" <adam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> According to my SAYC do***ent, Gerber is part of SAYC only after 1NT,
>> 2NT, and 2C-2D-2NT openings.
>
> Your do***ent is wrong. Check the official one on the ACBL web site, it
> says "over any 1NT or 2NT bid by partner including a rebid of 1NT or
> 2NT."
>
> So in the auction 1C-1S-1NT/2NT-4C, 4C is Gerber. And since OKbridge
> rules are that you alert non-SAYC bids, this doesn't need to be alerted.
>
> On the other hand, if your agreement is that 1H-2H-4C is Gerber, that's
> alertable.
Unless it has changed recently, OKbridge uses *their* version of SAYC as
the
guideline for alerts, not what is posted by the ACBL.
What makes the ACBL's do***ent *official* for OKbridge? What counts is
"what
does OKbridge use as a baseline?"
Mmbridge
|
