Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge okbridge > Re: Statement o...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 27 of 42 Topic 80 of 143
Post > Topic >>

Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org

by "Bob in Idaho" <bobc@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 10, 2004 at 02:59 PM

Well since you put it that way, THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT that if  ALL
the Democrats in Florida had voted for Gore in 2000, Gore would be
President
today!  Another case closed.

Your "so-called" argument makes about as much sense as you telling me that
I
should plant only the vegetables that you prefer, in a garden that I am
planting for myself.

Except in your own mind, you have totally failed to prove your case
against
Nader.

According to your logic, you might as well take a shot at the Reform Party
which garnered 17,484 votes in Florida or the Libertarian Party which
garnered 16,415 votes in Florida.  Either of those parties candidates
votes
could also have pushed Gore over the top, well except for one tiny little
factor, the people who voted for those candidates didn't vote for Gore
either!  They voted for the candidate of their choice, and it wasn't Al
Gore.

You might as well say that George W. Bush cost Al Gore the election, since
he was able to convince Democrats to vote for him who wouldn't otherwise
have voted for him, if he hadn't run for the office of POTUSA.

Face it fella, until there is a constitutional amendment passed making our
political system a two party system, you'll just have to live with the
fact
that not everyone agrees with the Democrat/Republican Party agendas.  It's
politics in America, get used to it.

One question though:  If by chance Ralph Nader were to pull out this time
around, which parties candidate are you going to blame if George W. Bush
wins again?

Bob C.
Idahoan for Nader
"rw" <rw56_to_the_chase@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:x5Wdc.4548$A_4.917@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bob in Idaho wrote:
> > How is it that I am "equivocating," when registered voters of the
Democratic
> > Party couldn't bring themselves to vote for their own parties choice
for
> > POTUSA
>
> You are equivocating because there is ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT that if Nader
> hadn't run in 2000, then Gore would be President today. Case closed.
>
> -- 
> Cut "to the chase" for my email address.
 




 42 Posts in Topic:
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-09 00:06:15 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
cyli@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-04-08 21:06:22 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"rb608" <fle  2004-04-09 02:32:33 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"John B., Indianapol  2004-04-08 22:01:16 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Asadi" <j-s  2004-04-09 11:27:20 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-09 16:48:44 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-09 22:50:07 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-09 20:50:39 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-10 01:32:54 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob C in Idaho"  2004-04-10 02:19:12 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
George Cleveland <geor  2004-04-09 21:25:07 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob C in Idaho"  2004-04-10 02:59:27 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
George Cleveland <geor  2004-04-09 22:02:22 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
howhow84@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-04-10 03:55:15 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"quack" <qua  2004-04-10 12:05:22 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
gazelle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-04-10 16:33:01 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
tomncora@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-04-12 14:32:45 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-10 10:36:20 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-10 17:24:45 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Wayne Harrison"  2004-04-10 17:31:27 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-10 19:08:06 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Wayne Harrison"  2004-04-11 00:06:27 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob C in Idaho"  2004-04-11 01:04:42 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Charles Tomaras&quo  2004-04-10 23:52:44 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"David Snedeker"  2004-04-14 09:27:59 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob C in Idaho"  2004-04-15 00:02:51 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-10 14:59:53 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-10 20:03:13 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-10 18:41:39 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
daytripper <day_trippr  2004-04-10 23:04:02 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Wolfgang" <  2004-04-10 18:09:56 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-11 02:14:42 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Mmbridge" <  2004-04-10 23:19:28 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-11 03:36:30 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Wolfgang" <  2004-04-10 15:10:57 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Karl Lohninger <midoil  2004-04-10 21:36:21 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Mike Connor" &  2004-04-10 23:42:09 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-10 18:59:19 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org (CROSS POSTING)
"Charles Tomaras&quo  2004-04-10 17:55:52 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"John B., Indianapol  2004-04-11 00:01:20 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"nielsdt" <f  2004-04-10 07:41:18 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Michael P. Thompson  2004-04-12 04:42:37 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 18 20:38:50 CDT 2008.