Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Bridge okbridge > Re: Statement o...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 12 of 42 Topic 80 of 143
Post > Topic >>

Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org

by "Bob C in Idaho" <bobc@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 10, 2004 at 02:59 AM

If only 1000 of the 200,000 Democrats hadn't voted for Bush, your argument
would have some relevance within the context of the preceding post.

Bob C
Idahoan for Nader
"George Cleveland" <georgecleveland@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:seme7013kcvuvs0bis03op3k0mpv3oekd8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 02:19:12 GMT, "Bob C in Idaho" <bobc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> >"Twelve percent of Florida Democrats (over 200,000) voted for
Republican
> >George Bush"
> >-San Francisco Chronicle, Nov. 9, 2000
> >
> >The Greens received 97,488 votes and the votes cast for all other
candidates
> >and write-ins amounted to 40,579 --grand total of 138,067.  So one
could
> >logically conclude from these figures that NO votes cast for Ralph
Nader
had
> >any affect on the outcome.  However, had registered Democrats trusted
their
> >parties choice, George Bush would likely be reading comic books at his
Texas
> >ranch rather than in the White House.
> >
> >If figures don't impress you, please, explain how you can conclude that
> >votes not cast for Nader (or any of the other non-major candidates)
> >automatically convert in to votes for Gore?
> >
> >Bob C.
> >Idahoan for Nader
> >
> >"rw" <rw56_to_the_chase@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >news:a9Idc.3836$A_4.3064@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Bob in Idaho wrote:
> >> > Precisely!  Votes cast for Ralph Nader have absolutely no affect on
the
> >> > outcome of the race between the two main candidates, no matter
where
> >those
> >> > votes were are cast.
> >>
> >> How about, for example, Florida in 2000?
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Cut "to the chase" for my email address.
>
> Absolutely illogical. If only 1000 Naderites had voted for Gore
> instead of Ralf, then we wouldn't have the assholes we currently have
> in control of the Whitehouse. Perhaps other assholes but certainly not
> the ones there now. In the system we have now, with no run off
> elections  between the two top vote getters third parties will always
> have the effect of tilting the election one way or another.
>
>
> g.c.
 




 42 Posts in Topic:
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-09 00:06:15 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
cyli@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-04-08 21:06:22 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"rb608" <fle  2004-04-09 02:32:33 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"John B., Indianapol  2004-04-08 22:01:16 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Asadi" <j-s  2004-04-09 11:27:20 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-09 16:48:44 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-09 22:50:07 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-09 20:50:39 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-10 01:32:54 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob C in Idaho"  2004-04-10 02:19:12 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
George Cleveland <geor  2004-04-09 21:25:07 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob C in Idaho"  2004-04-10 02:59:27 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
George Cleveland <geor  2004-04-09 22:02:22 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
howhow84@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-04-10 03:55:15 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"quack" <qua  2004-04-10 12:05:22 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
gazelle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-04-10 16:33:01 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
tomncora@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-04-12 14:32:45 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-10 10:36:20 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-10 17:24:45 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Wayne Harrison"  2004-04-10 17:31:27 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-10 19:08:06 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Wayne Harrison"  2004-04-11 00:06:27 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob C in Idaho"  2004-04-11 01:04:42 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Charles Tomaras&quo  2004-04-10 23:52:44 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"David Snedeker"  2004-04-14 09:27:59 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob C in Idaho"  2004-04-15 00:02:51 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-10 14:59:53 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-10 20:03:13 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-10 18:41:39 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
daytripper <day_trippr  2004-04-10 23:04:02 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Wolfgang" <  2004-04-10 18:09:56 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-11 02:14:42 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Mmbridge" <  2004-04-10 23:19:28 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
rw <rw56_to_the_chase@  2004-04-11 03:36:30 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Wolfgang" <  2004-04-10 15:10:57 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
Karl Lohninger <midoil  2004-04-10 21:36:21 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Mike Connor" &  2004-04-10 23:42:09 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Bob in Idaho"   2004-04-10 18:59:19 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org (CROSS POSTING)
"Charles Tomaras&quo  2004-04-10 17:55:52 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"John B., Indianapol  2004-04-11 00:01:20 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"nielsdt" <f  2004-04-10 07:41:18 
Re: Statement on Spam and VoteNader.org
"Michael P. Thompson  2004-04-12 04:42:37 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 2:40:25 CDT 2008.