On May 15, 4:44 pm, rl.inv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On May 15, 4:42 pm, rl.inv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 13, 7:20 pm, Don Woods <don...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > One question that popped to mind from a quick skim of the rules:
> > > You note that more than one piece can be eliminated in one move
> > > (by becoming completely surrounded). I can certainly see that in
> > > cases where the piece just moved (or forced) occupies the last
> > > open side next to two or more pieces. But what if the pieces
> > > thus surrounded are themselves mutually adjacent, such that
> > > removing any of them means the others are no longer surrounded.
>
> > > Are the removals performed simultaneously? Or does the moving
> > > player get to choose the order, stopping once there are no longer
> > > any surrounded pieces?
>
> > > -- Don.
>
> > >
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -- Don Woods (don...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) Note: If you reply by mail,
I'll get to
> > > --http://www.iCynic.com/~don
it sooner if you remove the
"hyphen n s"
>
> > Hey, thanks for addressing this issue. In most cases, the pieces are
> > adjacent. Both should be removed simultaneously. Hence the "the piece
> > should be removed IMMEDIATELY."
>
> > Any other questions?
>
> Hey, thanks for addressing this issue. In most cases, the pieces are
> adjacent. Both should be removed simultaneously. Hence the "the
> piece(s)
> should be removed IMMEDIATELY."
>
> Any other questions?
>
> Thanks,
> Ray Li
Hey, thanks for addressing this issue. In most cases, the pieces are
adjacent. Both should be removed simultaneously.
Any other questions?
Thanks,
Ray Li
|
