Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Abstract (perfect information, pure strategy) > Re: Potential s...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 13 Topic 650 of 669
Post > Topic >>

Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (electronic

by Rick Jones <r.t.jones@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 14, 2008 at 06:03 PM

Quadibloc wrote:
> On May 8, 2:46 pm, Rich Hutnik <richardhut...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> This is just the electronic variety.  This is a large market.  Should
>> be enough to justify there being a table games network actually.
> 
> Right now, of course, things are in the early stages.
> 
> For example, while I think most Chess servers cost money to join,
> there appear to be a lot of free Go servers. (Bizarrely enough,
> there's even one in North Korea!)

    You can join and play on Pogo for free. Chess is one of a number of 
games that are available there for free play, and there's a possibility 
of winning a cash jackpot.
    I have no connection to Pogo other than being a gamer there for a 
number of years.

-- 

                      Rick Jones
           Remove the Extra Dot to e-mail me

I'm Gomer Pyle of Borg. Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!
 




 13 Posts in Topic:
Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (electroni
Rich Hutnik <richardhu  2008-05-08 13:46:44 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Harald Korneliussen <v  2008-05-08 23:14:37 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Poster <poster@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 15:26:43 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Rich Hutnik <richardhu  2008-05-10 18:49:30 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-13 18:50:39 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Rick Jones <r.t.jones@  2008-05-14 18:03:35 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Harald Korneliussen <v  2008-05-14 02:43:42 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-14 05:02:46 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Erich Schneider <erich  2008-05-14 09:41:10 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-14 11:57:03 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-15 12:27:37 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Harald Korneliussen <v  2008-05-15 15:25:54 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-15 17:25:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 0:31:31 CDT 2008.