On May 13, 7:50=A0pm, Quadibloc <jsav...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I saw Inside Moves on sale, and thought it was a much smaller variant
> of Chivalry (something slightly bigger than Cam, though), but I see I
> was mistaken - instead, it was exactly the same as Camelot, which was
> modified from Chivalry by being on a bigger board - but having only
> four "knights" on each side instead of eight.
I didn't quite get this right.
Camelot was smaller than Chivalry, not just in the number of pieces,
but also in the size of the board; so I was right in thinking of
Inside Moves as smaller; my problem was simply that I was unaware of
the entire intervening existence of Camelot.
John Savard
|
