Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Abstract (perfect information, pure strategy) > Re: Potential s...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 13 Topic 650 of 669
Post > Topic >>

Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (electronic

by Quadibloc <jsavard@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 14, 2008 at 05:02 AM

On May 14, 3:43 am, Harald Korneliussen <vinterm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> The problem for checkers was "solved" early in the 18th century, when
> some clever Dutchman realised the game plays better on 10x10, with
> long king and some other small changes compared to English Checkers.
> This is the version of the game that is most popular in the world
> today, but it does not appear to be very well-known in the English-
> speaking world.

My web page at

http://www.quadibloc.com/other/bo0102.htm

indeed notes that Polish Checkers, or Continental Checkers is
considered the international form of the game, and has so far not had
a need for the measures applied to English Draughts.

Why Americans and Australians and Englismen are willing to go to such
lengths rather than simply join the rest of the world may well be
perplexing to some, but I was not concerning myself with this point.
Certainly, switching to another game is another option - in the case
of Chess, that could be Capablanca Chess, or it could be Tsiu Shogi -
but the measures applied to the standard English game of Checkers are
still an interesting case history.

John Savard
 




 13 Posts in Topic:
Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (electroni
Rich Hutnik <richardhu  2008-05-08 13:46:44 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Harald Korneliussen <v  2008-05-08 23:14:37 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Poster <poster@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 15:26:43 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Rich Hutnik <richardhu  2008-05-10 18:49:30 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-13 18:50:39 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Rick Jones <r.t.jones@  2008-05-14 18:03:35 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Harald Korneliussen <v  2008-05-14 02:43:42 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-14 05:02:46 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Erich Schneider <erich  2008-05-14 09:41:10 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-14 11:57:03 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-15 12:27:37 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Harald Korneliussen <v  2008-05-15 15:25:54 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-15 17:25:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 19:53:14 CDT 2008.