Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gaming > Abstract (perfect information, pure strategy) > Re: Potential s...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 13 Topic 650 of 669
Post > Topic >>

Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (electronic

by Harald Korneliussen <vintermann@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 14, 2008 at 02:43 AM

On May 14, 3:50=A0am, Quadibloc <jsav...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> how Checkers has coped, with two-move restrictions, three-move
> restrictions, and the eleven-man ballot, with a situation of more
> severity - one very different from Chess, because it was bad enough to
> force the vast majority of players to admit something had to be done

The problem for checkers was "solved" early in the 18th century, when
some clever Dutchman realised the game plays better on 10x10, with
long king and some other small changes compared to English Checkers.
This is the version of the game that is most popular in the world
today, but it does not appear to be very well-known in the English-
speaking world.
 




 13 Posts in Topic:
Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (electroni
Rich Hutnik <richardhu  2008-05-08 13:46:44 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Harald Korneliussen <v  2008-05-08 23:14:37 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Poster <poster@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 15:26:43 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Rich Hutnik <richardhu  2008-05-10 18:49:30 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-13 18:50:39 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Rick Jones <r.t.jones@  2008-05-14 18:03:35 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Harald Korneliussen <v  2008-05-14 02:43:42 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-14 05:02:46 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Erich Schneider <erich  2008-05-14 09:41:10 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-14 11:57:03 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-15 12:27:37 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Harald Korneliussen <v  2008-05-15 15:25:54 
Re: Potential size for boardgames/abstract strategy games (elect
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2008-05-15 17:25:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 7:51:56 CDT 2008.