Re: The Future of Chess and Getting It "Unstuck"

In message 
<a7a5edf4-e50e-4fe5-a62c-2490c2bd1464@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
Rich Hutnik <richardhutnik@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>On Apr 17, 10:16 am, David Richerby <dav...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>> My take on Goedel's incompleteness theorems is that almost all
>> invocations of them are made by people who are ignorant of what they
>> mean.
>
>You mean individuals like Steven Hawkings and Freeman John Dyson don't
>know a thing about Godel's Incompleteness Theorem?

He said almost all. Not all. Though that doesn't automatically mean that
Hawking (no s) and Dyson are right, I didn't feel like investigating. 
But if
they are (they are certainly up to it) that wouldn't invalidate the 
comment.

But chess is much too limited for these theorems (plural, there are two) 
to
apply.

-- 
Christopher Dearlove